335
I the
the Navy, supporting a claim of £117. 18.6 preferred against this Covernment for Stores furnished in 1866 - 1867 and 1869 to the barber and Police Departments.
"
In reply, I have the hoven to acquaint your Lordship that to the extent of £79 16.44, this claim is corect, the Stores issued in 1867 of the value of £32.7.8 not having been fraid for, and the payment made in 1869 for the Stores of that amounting to. £47.8nd having been cancelled by a refund. It is more then probable that the Naval
year
Authorities at home were under the impression, when submitting their
A
claims that their instructions relative
year
to refunds had been made to embrace as well the transactions of the 1866 as
those of succeeding years; but such was not the case, as
I find that the payment of £ 37. 12. 2
made on the 10th June 1867 for the Shores of 1866 has not been
refunded. I have the hover to be.
My Lord.
Your Lordships mat obedient-
humble Servant,
KM
M. Matfeld
Major General and Lieut. Beverun
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.